诗论考
3 段
诗学论著的考察
Kabbasatthavicāraṇā
4复次，他又这样说：“虽然佛音尊者看起来并不像是精通《罗摩衍那》与《摩诃婆罗多》这两大诗学论著的样子，但他仍然点明了它们。如何点明呢？所谓‘讲述’，即指婆罗多战争等事；在何处讲述，便不应前往该处。他还指出了它（杂秽虚言）的两种要素：以婆罗多战争、掠走悉多等无义之事为先导，以及讲述这类故事。”
4. Punapi so evamāha ‘‘kiñcāpi buddhaghoso rāmāyaṇamahābhāratasaṅkhātānaṃ mahākabbasatthānaṃ sukusalo viya na dissati, tathāpi tāni dassesi. Kathaṃ? Akkhānanti bhāratayujjhanādikaṃ, taṃ yasmiṃ ṭhāne kathīyati, tattha gantumpi na vaṭṭatīti ca, tassa (samphapalāpassa) dve sambhārā bhāratayuddhasītāharaṇādiniratthakakathāpurekkhāratā tathārūpikathākathanañcāti ca dassesī’’ti.
然而，这比前说更加无因，纯粹只是不敬而已。对于义理极为深奥、极应尊重的三藏，在对它进行义解时，却详细阐明那由无义杂语、虚浮言辞堆砌而成的诗学论，这能有何用？有智者对此只会感到不被尊重与轻蔑。
Taṃ pana purimavacanatopi ahetukataraṃ kevalaṃ anādarīkaraṇamattameva. Atigambhīratthassa hi atigarukaraṇīyassa piṭakattayassa atthasaṃvaṇṇanāyaṃ niratthakassa samphapalāpasamudāyabhūtassa kabbasatthassa vitthārato pakāsanena kiṃ siyā payojanaṃ, aññadatthu sāyevassa asammānitā, anādariyā ca viññūhīti.