5. 根分别随复注
5. Indriyavibhaṅgo
19 段
2. 阿毗达摩分别注释
1. Abhidhammabhājanīyavaṇṇanā
219“眼门的状态”是指以眼门为因。“由那些属于该门者”是指在那道门里生起的心与心所。因为它们以那道门作为生起的处所,所以叫“属于该门者”。难道不是也以那门为所依而发挥根的作用吗?所以注释里说:“在锐利的当中是锐利,在迟钝的当中是迟钝。”确实如此,它确实发挥根的作用,但在这里,即使是以那门为所依的,也仍然只叫“属于该门者”。因为眼根在没有舍弃门的状态下,从依止的意义上被称为“所依处”。或者,由于在属于该门者当中,它的根的作用很明显,所以说“由那些属于该门者”。为了说明根的作用是随他人转、具有主导性,所以说“因为那……随转”。其中,“那”指眼根,“那些”指属于该门者。“āvī”这个词是表示动作完成,就像“vijitāvī”等词里那样,所以说“完成所作之知”。
219.Cakkhudvārabhāveti cakkhudvārabhāvahetu. Taṃdvārikehīti tasmiṃ dvāre pavattanakehi cittacetasikehi. Te hi ‘‘taṃ dvāraṃ pavattiokāsabhūtaṃ etesaṃ atthī’’ti taṃdvārikā. Nanu ca tabbatthukehipi taṃ indaṭṭhaṃ kāreti. Tenāha aṭṭhakathāyaṃ ‘‘tikkhe tikkhattā, mande ca mandattā’’ti? Saccaṃ kāreti, tabbatthukāpi pana idha ‘‘taṃdvārikā’’icceva vuttā. Apariccattadvārabhāvaṃyeva hi cakkhu nissayaṭṭhena ‘‘vatthū’’ti vuccati. Atha vā taṃdvārikesu tassa indaṭṭho pākaṭoti ‘‘taṃdvārikehī’’ti vuttaṃ. Indaṭṭho parehi anuvattanīyatā paramissarabhāvoti dassento ‘‘tañhi…pe… anuvattantī’’ti āha. Tattha tanti cakkhuṃ. Teti taṃdvārike. Kiriyāniṭṭhānavācī āvī-saddo ‘‘vijitāvī’’tiādīsu (dī. ni. 1.258; 2.33; 3.199) viyāti āha ‘‘pariniṭṭhitakiccajānana’’nti.
比丘们,有这六根。哪六种呢?眼根……意根。在某些地方,六根就是这样出现的。那么,为什么在经里,诸根不像蕴等那样被集中在一起宣说,而在阿毗达摩里却集中宣说了呢?针对这个问题,论师说“其中,在经中”等等。关于“属于出离、出离之果、出离之方便等”这句话:在这里,属于出世间道的诸根是出离,其余的诸根是出离之果;依止还灭而生的信根等是出离的方便;在其余诸根中,有些是流转的本身,有些是流转的方便,应当这样理解。
‘‘Cha imāni, bhikkhave, indriyāni. Katamāni cha? Cakkhundriyaṃ…pe… manindriya’’nti (saṃ. ni. 5.495-499) evaṃ katthaci chapindriyāni āgatāni, kasmā pana suttante khandhādayo viya indriyāni ekajjhaṃ na vuttāni, abhidhamme ca vuttānīti āha ‘‘tattha suttante’’tiādi. Nissaraṇūpāyādibhāvatoti ettha lokuttaresu maggapariyāpannāni nissaraṇaṃ, itarāni nissaraṇaphalaṃ, vivaṭṭasannissitena nibbattitāni saddhindriyādīni nissaraṇūpāyo, itaresu kānici pavattibhūtāni, kānici pavattiupāyoti veditabbāni.
对漏尽者来说,这已成为他的本性;就像六支舍一样,它正是唯有漏尽者本身才具有的法性。
Khīṇāsavassa bhāvabhūtoti chaḷaṅgupekkhā viya khīṇāsavasseva dhammabhūto.
“二义”是指根的特相和根所显示的意义。依各自的缘,就是依各自的业等缘。在具有彼的相续中,就是在具有女根的相续和具有男根的相续中。以不同的方式,就是以不同于女性等的方式。女根和男根的随转状态,就是增上作用,这是文句的关联。在这个义中,就是在增上作用义中。
Dveatthāti indaliṅgaindasiṭṭhaṭṭhā. Attano paccayavasenāti yathāsakaṃ kammādipaccayavasena. Taṃsahitasantāneti itthindriyasahite, purisindriyasahite ca santāne. Aññākārenāti itthiādito aññena ākārena. Anuvattanīyabhāvo itthipurisindriyānaṃ ādhipaccanti yojanā. Imasmiñcattheti ādhipaccatthe.
“它们”是指未知当知根等三根。乐根和苦根所体验的可意与不可意的滋味,应当只依所缘本身的自性来了知,而不是像某些喜根等那样靠想象来了知。为了说明这一点,所以说“在此”等话。
Tesanti anaññātaññassāmītindriyādīnaṃ tiṇṇaṃ. Yā sukhadukkhindriyānaṃ iṭṭhāniṭṭhākārasambhogarasatā vuttā, sā ārammaṇasabhāveneva veditabbā, na ekaccasomanassindriyādīnaṃ viya parikappavasenāti dassento ‘‘ettha cā’’tiādimāha.
虽然命根在色蕴的讨论中(《法集论》584)是紧接男根之后被宣说的,但那是指色命根;而且在那个地方,也不是先说了意根之后才说女根和男根的。然而在此处的注释中,为了说明所讲的根之次第在一切方面都与《双论》的教说相符合,便说道“它与《根双论》的教说相合”。前内与后外,是指眼等前五根属于内、女根等后五根属于外。在两者中间宣说命根,用意是要表明命根对二者都有资助作用。由此也说明,即使依照教说的次第,也可以说命根的次第。虽然此处是这样说的,但在后面的作用判定中,仍将按照此圣典中出现的次第来说明:命根在意根之后,女根和男根在命根之后,其作用判定即依此次第而说。所有这一切都是苦,或以行苦的方式,或按各自情况以苦苦等方式。守护两种状态者,是指守护依色与非色而有的两种有身;因为这里所取的命根也依色与非色而有两种。“转起”一词,是以命根令俱生诸法转起的作用,来说明所感受者应当被转起。“与修习道相应”一词,是用来排除作为果的已知根。这里其实也可以不说“修习”一词,因为已经说了“应修习故”,修习之义已经很明显。“见之后”是就同类而无间隔而说的,不是指无间缘。
Yadipi purisindriyānantaraṃ jīvitindriyaṃ rūpakaṇḍepi (dha. sa. 584) desitaṃ, taṃ pana rūpajīvitindriyaṃ, na ca tattha manindriyaṃ vatvā itthipurisindriyāni vuttāni. Idha pana aṭṭhakathāyaṃ indriyānukkamo vutto sabbākārena yamakadesanāya saṃsandatīti dassento āha ‘‘so indriyayamakadesanāya sametī’’ti. Purimapacchimānaṃ ajjhattikabāhirānanti cakkhādīnaṃ purimānaṃ ajjhattikānaṃ, itthindriyādīnaṃ pacchimānaṃ bāhirānaṃ. Tesaṃ majjhe vuttaṃ ubhayesaṃ upakārakatādīpanatthanti adhippāyo. Tena evampi desanantarānurodhena jīvitindriyassa anukkamaṃ vattuṃ vaṭṭatīti dasseti. Kāmañcettha evaṃ vuttaṃ, parato pana kiccavinicchaye idha pāḷiyaṃ āgataniyāmeneva manindriyānantaraṃ jīvitindriyassa, tadanantarañca itthipurisindriyānaṃ kiccavinicchayaṃ dassessati. Sabbaṃ taṃ dukkhaṃ saṅkhāradukkhabhāvena, yathārahaṃ vā dukkhadukkhatādibhāvena. Duvidhattabhāvānupālakassāti rūpārūpavasena duvidhassa attabhāvassa anupālakassa. Rūpārūpavasena duvidhampi hi jīvitindriyaṃ idha gahitaṃ. ‘‘Pavattī’’ti etena sahajātadhammānaṃ pavattanarasena jīvitindriyena vedayitānaṃ pavattetabbataṃ dīpeti. ‘‘Bhāvanāmaggasampayutta’’nti iminā phalabhūtaṃ aññindriyaṃ nivatteti. Bhāvanāgahaṇañcettha sakkā avattuṃ. ‘‘Bhāvetabbattā’’ti vuttattā bhāvanābhāvo pākaṭova. Dassanānantarāti samānajātibhūmikena abyavahitataṃ sandhāyāha, na anantarapaccayaṃ.
这里“它的”指的是根缘的状态。“不与他共通”是指与其他非根法不共通。这样从能力上确定了作用的差别之后,再从论典的角度来说明它,即“因为在根论中宣说故”。“其他的”是指其他那些具有根性、与根俱生的法。那些让它们行使根之义的法,并没有支配它们的能力;就像意根没有前导性一样,它们自身反而完全随顺意根而转。因此说“与它相应的也……”等。如果是这样,它们怎么会有根之义呢?前面已经说过“只是让相应的法随顺乐等。”这里“他们之缘”是指作为女、男相状等缘的业等;“于彼生起中为相状”是指在生起女性相状等形色中作为因。这应当被视为女根等在那里存在的状态本身。因为凡当它存在时某法存在,而当它不存在时某法不存在,那法就是它的因。以“相状状态是随顺”这一说法,显示了“随顺”一词的业处之义。犹如已到达乐苦状态那样,即自身犹如已到达乐苦自性,犹如乐边、苦边,这是意思。不存在的……乃至……舍的状态的令生起,应以无知、舍置等方式了知。同类的,即以不善的乐苦与不善的舍,以无记的与无记的舍,以善的乐与善的舍。在那里也应以地的分别来分解此义而结合。那一切都应以蕴分别中所说的粗显微细的分别来说明。以“等”一词,即在“欲贪、嗔恚等”这里所说的“等”一词。以结的断除及彼之所依缘性,正是针对此而说未知根的作用暂时未被广说,那也仍然可得上分结的止息断除作用。或者,由于无嗔恚,不应说未知根的止息断除作用,因此其他根的止息断除作用在义注中也未提及。因为道无间果从“以那信未止息故”等语来看,是以烦恼的止息方式生起,而非其他。否则圣者将一切时都有未止息的烦恼热恼。然而对于其他的,如在无欲者中的众生言说一样,应以习惯用法了知止息作用。
Tassāti indriyapaccayabhāvassa. Anaññasādhāraṇattāti aññehi anindriyehi asādhāraṇattā. Evaṃ sāmatthiyato kiccavisesaṃ vavatthapetvā pakaraṇatopi taṃ dasseti ‘‘indriyakathāya ca pavattattā’’ti. Aññesanti aññesaṃ indriyasabhāvānampi sahajātadhammānaṃ. Yehi te indaṭṭhaṃ kārenti, tesaṃ vasavattāpanaṃ natthi, yathā manindriyassa pubbaṅgamasabhāvābhāvato sayañca te aññadatthu manindriyasseva vase vattanti. Tenāha ‘‘taṃsampayuttānipi hī’’tiādi. Yadi evaṃ kathaṃ tesaṃ indaṭṭhoti? ‘‘Sukhanādilakkhaṇe sampayuttānaṃ attākārānuvidhāpanamatta’’nti vuttovāyamattho . ‘‘Cetasikattā’’ti iminā sampayuttadhammānaṃ cittassa padhānataṃ dasseti. Tato hi ‘‘cetasikā’’ti vuccanti. Sabbatthāti vasavattāpanaṃ sahajātadhammānupālananti evaṃ yāva amatābhimukhabhāvapaccayatā ca sampayuttānanti taṃkiccaniddese. ‘‘Anuppādane, anupatthambhe ca satī’’ti padaṃ āharitvā sambandhitabbaṃ. Na hi padattho sabbhāvaṃ byabhicaratīti janakupatthambhakattābhāvepīti vuttaṃ hoti. Tappaccayānanti itthipurisanimittādipaccayānaṃ kammādīnaṃ. Tappavattane nimittabhāvoti itthinimittādiākārarūpanibbattane kāraṇabhāvo. Svāyaṃ itthindriyādīnaṃ tattha atthibhāvoyevāti daṭṭhabbaṃ. Yasmiñhi sati yaṃ hoti, asati ca na hoti, taṃ tassa kāraṇanti. ‘‘Nimittabhāvo anuvidhāna’’nti iminā anuvidhānasaddassa kammatthataṃ dasseti. Sukhadukkhabhāvappattā viyāti sayaṃ sukhadukkhasabhāvappattā viya, sukhantā dukkhantā ca viyāti attho. Asantassa…pe… majjhattākārānupāpanaṃ aññāṇupekkhanādivasena veditabbaṃ. Samānajātiyanti akusalehi sukhadukkhehi akusalūpekkhāya, abyākatehi abyākatūpekkhāya, kusalasukhato kusalūpekkhāya. Tatthāpi bhūmivibhāgenāyamattho bhinditvā yojetabbo. Taṃ sabbaṃ khandhavibhaṅge vuttaoḷārikasukhumavibhāgena dīpetabbaṃ. Ādisaddenāti ‘‘kāmarāgabyāpādādī’’ti ettha vuttaādisaddena. Saṃyojanasamucchindanatadupanissayatā eva sandhāya aññātāvindriyassa kiccantarāpasutatā vuttā, tassāpi uddhambhāgiyasaṃyojanapaṭippassaddhippahānakiccatā labbhateva. Abyāpībhāvato vā aññātāvindriyassa paṭippassaddhippahānakiccaṃ na vattabbaṃ, tato aññindriyassāpi taṃ aṭṭhakathāyaṃ anuddhaṭaṃ. Maggānantarañhi phalaṃ ‘‘tāya saddhāya avūpasantāyā’’tiādivacanato (dha. sa. aṭṭha. 505) kilesānaṃ paṭippassambhanavasena pavattati, na itaraṃ. Aññathā ariyā sabbakālaṃ appaṭippassaddhakilesadarathā siyuṃ. Itarassa pana nicchandarāgesu sattavohāro viya ruḷhivasena paṭippassaddhikiccatā veditabbā.
这里有人问:为什么只说了这些根,而且说的就是这些呢?如果是因为增上的意义能够成立。所谓增上,就是前面说的“自在”。这种增上,在自己的作用上强而有力,在其他自性法上同样也可以得到。因为缘所生的法都是依缘而运转的。所以它们随顺那些缘,那些缘也随顺它们。确实如此,不过它们之间还是有差别。这个差别在注释书里已经显示过了,比如“在眼识等生起时,眼等的增上性就已经成立”等等。
Etthāha – kasmā pana ettakāneva indriyāni vuttāni, etāni eva ca vuttānīti? Ādhipaccatthasambhavatoti ce. Ādhipaccaṃ nāma issariyanti vuttametaṃ. Tayidaṃ ādhipaccaṃ attano kicce balavanti aññesampi sabhāvadhammānaṃ labbhateva. Paccayādhīnavuttikā hi paccayuppannā . Tasmā te tehi anuvattīyanti, te ca te anuvattantīti? Saccametaṃ, tathāpi atthi tesaṃ viseso. Svāyaṃ viseso ‘‘cakkhuviññāṇādippavattiyañhi cakkhādīnaṃ siddhamādhipacca’’ntiādinā (vibha. aṭṭha. 219) aṭṭhakathāyaṃ dassitoyeva.
另外,在五蕴当中,对“众生”这个概念安立的区分依据,就是六内处。所以先依“增上”的意义,从“眼根……意根”等这样来说。可是,这些内处是靠哪个法才能运转起来的?为了说明那个法就是它们持续存在的因,所以说命根。为了说明跟这些根绑在一起的诸法,因为它们的缘故才被称为“女人”“男人”,所以说女根和男根。这个被称为“众生”的法聚,在相续运转中,就是被这些受所染污,为了说明这一点,所以说五受根。然后,为了说明想要清净的人所需要的清净资粮,所以说信等五根。再进一步,为了说明清净资粮就是靠这些根而清净,达到清净之后,就成为“所作已办”的人,所以在最后说了未知当知根等三根。每一处都应该接上“依增上义”这句话。到这里,想要表达的意思已经成立,所以不再举出其他的根。
Apica khandhapañcake yāyaṃ sattapaññatti, tassā visesanissayo cha ajjhattikāni āyatanānīti tāni tāva ādhipaccatthaṃ upādāya ‘‘cakkhundriyaṃ…pe… manindriya’’ntiādito vuttāni. Tāni pana yena dhammena pavattanti, ayaṃ so dhammo tesaṃ ṭhitihetūti dassanatthaṃ jīvitaṃ. Tayime indriyapaṭibaddhā dhammā imesaṃ vasena ‘‘itthī, puriso’’ti voharīyantīti dassanatthaṃ bhāvadvayaṃ. Svāyaṃ sattasaññito dhammapuñjo pabandhavasena pavattamāno imāhi vedanāhi saṃkilissatīti dassanatthaṃ vedanāpañcakaṃ. Tato visuddhatthikānaṃ vodānasambhāradassanatthaṃ saddhādipañcakaṃ. Tato vodānasambhārā imehi visujjhanti, visuddhippattā, niṭṭhitakiccā ca hontīti dassanatthaṃ ante anaññātaññassāmītindriyādīni tīṇi vuttāni. Sabbattha ‘‘ādhipaccatthaṃ upādāyā’’ti padaṃ yojetabbaṃ. Ettāvatā adhippetatthasiddhīti aññesaṃ aggahaṇaṃ.
或者,这些根也是为了显示流转和还灭的所依等而说的。因为在流转中,六内处特别是作为根本所依的。正如说:“世间在六处生起”等等。它的生起依靠女根和男根。因为大多数有情的身体再生,都是由于以异性为所缘的贪染之相。这确实说过:“大王,由三者的聚合而有入胎:这里父母聚合,母亲正值经期,香阴也已现前。”住立则依靠命根,因为需要由它来守护。因此说:“寿、住、维持、延续”等等。受用则依靠诸受,因为正是依于受,才有对可意等一切境界的受用。正如说:“感受、感受,比丘们,因此称为受。”这样,为了显示流转的所依、生起、住立和受用,从眼根到舍根,宣说了十四根。正如这些根是就流转而说,其余的则是就还灭而说。因为依于还转而生起的信等五根,是还灭的所依。还灭的生起依靠未知当知根,因为这是最初生起的。住立依靠已知根。受用依靠具知根,因为它受用最上的果。这样,也宣说了这些根。至此,由于想要显示的意义已经成就,所以不取其他的根。由此,它们的说示次第,也应知已被解释。
Atha vā pavattinivattīnaṃ nissayādidassanatthampi etāni eva vuttāni. Pavattiyā hi visesato mūlanissayabhūtāni cha ajjhattikāni āyatanāni. Yathāha ‘‘chasu loko samuppanno’’tiādi (su. ni. 171). Tassā uppatti itthipurisindriyehi. Visabhāgavatthusarāganimittā hi yebhuyyena sattakāyassa abhinibbatti. Vuttañhetaṃ ‘‘tiṇṇaṃ kho pana, mahārāja, sannipātā gabbhassāvakkanti hoti, idha mātāpitaro ca sannipatitā honti, mātā ca utunī hoti, gabbho ca paccupaṭṭhito hotī’’ti (ma. ni. 1.408; 2.411; mi. pa. 4.1.6). Avaṭṭhānaṃ jīvitindriyena tena anupāletabbato. Tenāha ‘‘āyu ṭhiti yapanā yāpanā’’tiādi. Upabhogo vedanāhi . Vedanāvasena hi iṭṭhādisabbavisayupabhogo. Yathāha – ‘‘vedayati vedayatīti kho, bhikkhave, tasmā vedanāti vuccatī’’ti (saṃ. ni. 3.79). Evaṃ pavattiyā nissayasamuppādaṭṭhitisambhogadassanatthaṃ cakkhundriyaṃ yāva upekkhindriyanti cuddasindriyāni desitāni. Yathā cetāni pavattiyā, evaṃ itarāni nivattiyā. Vivaṭṭasannissitena hi nibbattitāni saddhādīni pañca indriyāni nivattiyā nissayo. Uppādo anaññātaññassāmītindriyena tassa paṭhamaṃ uppajjanato. Avaṭṭhānaṃ aññindriyena. Upabhogo aññātāvindriyena aggaphalasamupabhogato. Evampi etāni eva indriyāni desitāni. Ettāvatā yathādhippetatthasiddhito aññesaṃ aggahaṇaṃ. Etenāpi nesaṃ desanānukkamopi saṃvaṇṇito veditabbo.
220善、不善精进等:这里“等”这个字,应当知道它包含了善定等,以及无记精进等。缘等:“等”这个字摄取了处、所缘等,包含了前面所说的精进等,也包含了眼等。这样一来,精进根等词和眼根等词,都是统摄一切的。通过“虽然如此存在”等说法,解说了对地的分别。通过遮除它,就是以遮除一切根皆具一切地性。对不可得者的摄:就是在那一各地中不可得的根,它具有摄性。
220.Kusalākusalavīriyādīnīti ettha ādi-saddena kusalasamādhiādīnaṃ, abyākatavīriyādīnañca saṅgaho daṭṭhabbo. Paccayādīti ādi-saddena desārammaṇādayo gahitā, yathāvuttavīriyādīni, cakkhādīni ca saṅgaṇhāti. Iccevaṃ sabbasaṅgāhikāni vīriyindriyādipadāni, cakkhundriyādipadāni ca. Tenāti ‘‘evaṃ santepī’’tiādinā bhūmivibhāgakathanena. Tannivattanenāti sabbesaṃ sabbabhūmikattanivattanena. Avijjamānasaṅgāhakattanti tassaṃ tassaṃ bhūmiyaṃ anupalabbhamānassa indriyassa saṅgāhakatā.
问答注释
2. Pañhapucchakavaṇṇanā
这里,当这样宣说“七根无所缘”即绝对无所缘时,命根并没有被提到,也没有被说到。但在复注中,则把“未被提到”作为复合词来解释。“摄于色法中”是指被算作“色”。以非色的部分、以非色的性质,在“可能有”的情况下被含摄。为什么?因为它有“小所缘”等性质。然而,因为“可能有”方面的含摄只适用于色与非色混合的情况,而不是单一组成部分,所以不认可单一组成部分的那一点,而说“意趣”。现在为了阐明这个含义,说了“但依非色部分”等。“不应说性”是指以小所缘等性质而不应说性。那么,如何是“以色部分”而无所缘者的不应说性呢?针对这一责难,说了“非无所缘”等。以“于不存在的所缘和无所缘中”这一说法,显示“无所缘”是外部含义复合词。于不应说中,是指以有所缘性而不应说中。无所缘性,是指无所缘的性质。“七根可能有小所缘,可能有大所缘,可能有无量所缘,也可能不应说为‘小所缘’‘大所缘’‘无量所缘’”等中,如同那样,显示并非只是有所缘者的不应说性。正如并非只是有所缘者的不应说性的同义词,而也是无所缘者的,因此有所缘者中没有决定。这样显示“不应说即只是有所缘”这一决定也不存在,而说“或者不应说者的有所缘性”。其不显示,是关联。“非……”等,阐明了那个含义。
Idha imasmiṃ ‘‘sattindriyā anārammaṇā’’ti evaṃ ekantānārammaṇatte vuccamāne na ābhaṭṭhaṃ jīvitindriyaṃ na bhāsitaṃ. Ṭīkāyaṃ pana anābhaṭṭhanti katasamāsaṃ katvā vuttaṃ. Rūpadhammesu saṅgahitatanti ‘‘rūpa’’nti gaṇitataṃ. Arūpakoṭṭhāsena arūpabhāvena siyāpakkhe saṅgahitaṃ. Kasmā? Tassa parittārammaṇāditā atthīti. Yasmā pana rūpārūpamissakasseva vasena siyāpakkhasaṅgaho yutto, na ekadesassa, tasmā ekadesassa taṃ anicchanto āha ‘‘adhippāyo’’ti. Idāni tamatthaṃ pakāsetuṃ ‘‘arūpakoṭṭhāsena panā’’tiādi vuttaṃ. Navattabbatāti parittārammaṇādibhāvena navattabbatā. Kathaṃ pana rūpakoṭṭhāsenassānārammaṇassa navattabbatāti codanaṃ sandhāyāha ‘‘na hi anārammaṇa’’ntiādi. ‘‘Avijjamānārammaṇānārammaṇesū’’ti iminā ‘‘anārammaṇā’’ti bāhiratthasamāso ayanti dasseti . Navattabbesūti sārammaṇabhāvena navattabbesu. Anārammaṇattāti ārammaṇarahitattā. ‘‘Navindriyā siyā parittārammaṇā, siyā mahaggatārammaṇā, siyā appamāṇārammaṇā, siyā na vattabbā ‘parittārammaṇā’tipi ‘mahaggatārammaṇā’tipi ‘appamāṇārammaṇā’tipī’’tiādīsu (vibha. 223) viya na sārammaṇasseva navattabbataṃ dasseti. Yathā ca na sārammaṇasseva navattabbatāpariyāyo, atha kho anārammaṇassāpīti sārammaṇe niyamābhāvo. Evaṃ navattabbaṃ sārammaṇamevāti ayampi niyamo natthīti dassento ‘‘navattabbassa vā sārammaṇata’’nti āha. Tassa na dassetīti sambandho. ‘‘Na hī’’tiādinā tamevatthaṃ vivarati.
在这里,有人责难说:“色法与涅槃的不应说性,是因为它们与乐等相应,而不是因为它们是狭小所缘等。”针对这一责难,论师先在心里考虑,然后才说了“或者也”等话。其中,“或者也成立”是连接关系。也可能应当说“没有所缘”——也就是说,要把没有所缘的法处和有缘的法分开,才应当这样说。如果“不应说”这个词只适用于有缘的法,那就不会这样说了;既然不这样说,又没有别的理由,论师为了说明这一点,就说“因为在问分中,没有有余的开示”。因此他的意思是:“不应说”这个词也适用于没有所缘的法。至于“八根也可能是内所缘”等说法,说这些法以内所缘等状态而不应说,是就命根在无所有处时、仅仅以“没有最初无色界识”为所缘这一点而言。这既不是为了说明只有有缘的法才不应说,也不是为了说明没有所缘的法就不具备“以狭小所缘等状态而不应说”的情况。为了说明这一点,就说“而在‘八根也可能是内所缘’等处”等话。其中,“也可能是内所缘”里的“等”一词,是“等”的意思。通过含摄其余经文,为了说明命根的意义,就说“命根……应知为不应说”,这正是前面已经说过的意思。
Tattha rūpanibbānānaṃ sukhādisampayuttabhāvena navattabbatā, na parittārammaṇādibhāvenāti codanaṃ manasi katvā āha ‘‘athāpī’’tiādi. Tattha athāpi vattatīti sambandho. Siyā anārammaṇantipi vattabbaṃ siyāti anārammaṇaṃ dhammāyatanaṃ sārammaṇehi visuṃ katvā evaṃ vattabbaṃ siyā. Navattabba-saddo yadi sārammaṇesveva vatteyya, na cevaṃ vuttaṃ, avacane ca aññaṃ kāraṇaṃ natthīti dassento āha ‘‘na hi pañhapucchake sāvasesā desanā atthī’’ti. Tasmā navattabba-saddo anārammaṇesupi vattatevāti adhippāyo. Yāpi ‘‘aṭṭhindriyā siyā ajjhattārammaṇā’’ti ajjhattārammaṇādibhāvena navattabbatā vuttā, sā jīvitindriyassa ākiñcaññāyatanakāle paṭhamāruppaviññāṇābhāvamattārammaṇataṃ sandhāya vuttā, na sārammaṇasseva navattabbatādassanatthaṃ, nāpi anārammaṇassa parittārammaṇādibhāvena navattabbatābhāvadassanatthanti dassento ‘‘aṭṭhindriyā siyā ajjhattārammaṇāti ettha cā’’tiādimāha. Tattha siyā ajjhattārammaṇātīti iti-saddo ādiattho. Tena avasiṭṭhapāḷisaṅgaṇhanena ‘‘siyā na vattabbā ‘ajjhattārammaṇā’tipi ‘bahiddhārammaṇā’tipi ‘ajjhattabahiddhārammaṇā’tipī’’ti imāya pāḷiyā vuttamatthaṃ jīvitindriyassa dassento ‘‘jīvitindriyassa…pe… navattabbatā veditabbā’’ti āha, taṃ vuttatthameva.